Malicious PDF — malware analysis report

Static analysis result for SHA-256 ece85acc17c621d8…

MALICIOUS

PDF

22.8 KB Created: 2009-05-06 20:45:24 +08:00 Authoring application: DocuCom PDF Core Library
MD5: b1d198d5c55bbd5c9af3a88237e183d9 SHA-1: 9c4b7a455db7376bb31b5a8850fc509d1f053bf9 SHA-256: ece85acc17c621d8e2ee765dd908eb0710e5aff05aa87f43a64405181634e42d
210 Risk Score

Malware Insights

MITRE ATT&CK
T1059.001 PowerShell T1204.002 Malicious File

This PDF file was flagged as malicious by ML classifiers and ClamAV, which identified it as a dropper. Embedded JavaScript streams were found, and a high-severity heuristic detected an unescape() call, indicating obfuscated code execution. The presence of these elements suggests the PDF is designed to exploit vulnerabilities and download further malicious content.

Machine Learning

  • Nyx PDF Classifier malicious score 0.9980

Heuristics 8

  • ClamAV: Pdf.Dropper.Agent-7320725-0 critical CLAMAV_DETECTION
    ClamAV detected this file as malware: Pdf.Dropper.Agent-7320725-0
  • ClamAV detection on extracted artifact critical EXTRACTED_FILE_CLAMAV
    ClamAV flagged at least one file extracted from inside this sample. Even when the wrapping document carries no AV detection of its own, a hit on the carved artifact is a strong indicator the sample is a delivery vehicle.
  • unescape() call high PDF_UNESCAPE
    unescape() found — often used to decode shellcode in PDF JS exploits (matched inside decoded stream)
  • JavaScript action low PDF_JAVASCRIPT
    PDF contains a /JavaScript action. Generic JavaScript is common in benign forms; specific dangerous APIs are scored by separate rules.
  • Embedded JS stream low PDF_JS
    PDF references a /JS stream. Generic JavaScript is common in benign forms; specific dangerous APIs are scored by separate rules.
  • PDF differential parser failed info PDF_DIFFERENTIAL_PARSE_FAILED
    The cross-check parser (pdfminer.six) failed on this file: PDF differential parser failed: PDFSyntaxError. Static heuristics still ran and any of their findings above are valid; only the differential cross-check signal is missing.
  • Suspicious extracted artifact info EXTRACTED_FILE_STATIC_TRIAGE
    One or more files extracted from inside this sample matched static suspicious-content checks such as script obfuscation, encoded payload blobs, packed data, or execution/download terms.
  • Embedded URL info EMBEDDED_URL
    One or more URLs were extracted from the document. The URL itself is not a detection — see the per-URL labels for which channel (macro, JS, link annotation, document body, ...) reached each URL.
    URL http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#
    • http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/
    • http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
    • http://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/mm/

Extracted artifacts 2

Files carved from inside the sample during analysis.

FilenameKindSourceSize
javascript_obj0003_000.js
3a63aa1468610780740c9dc83aeeec5b08cb097e75c7162b2fbf08d5be27c95c
pdf-javascript-stream PDF /JS object 3 at offset 0x883 7299 bytes
Detection
ClamAV: Pdf.Exploit.Agent-35646
Obfuscation or payload: likely
Carved artifact contains 4 eval/decoder/string-building token(s).
javascript_obj0026_001.js
1065c01601a18ae557d2452001490336a210f70445484c315f11b32d29f48436
pdf-javascript-stream PDF /JS object 26 at offset 0x20D6 14540 bytes
Detection
ClamAV: Pdf.Exploit.Agent-35646
Obfuscation or payload: unlikely