Malicious PDF — malware analysis report

Static analysis result for SHA-256 6329765f09dc93bd…

MALICIOUS

PDF

16.6 KB
MD5: 246b212cee1651a70d1cb968d9115104 SHA-1: 34a3351d90e25ba98cb8b78db8503ff1e2ebcdae SHA-256: 6329765f09dc93bdb4acd7a455c3c3f90d1127af337f36a5c81e1d229a5e053c
194 Risk Score

Malware Insights

MITRE ATT&CK
T1059.001 PowerShell

The PDF file exhibits strong indicators of malicious intent, including high-severity heuristic firings for JavaScript execution, eval(), and unescape() calls, along with ClamAV detection of obfuscated objects. The presence of embedded JavaScript streams, specifically 'javascript_obj0116_000.js' and 'javascript_obj0123_002.js', suggests that the document's primary function is to deliver and execute malicious scripts. The ML classifier also strongly flagged this PDF as malicious. The obfuscated nature of the JavaScript and the lack of readable document body text prevent a more precise determination of the ultimate payload or delivery mechanism.

Machine Learning

  • Nyx PDF Classifier malicious score 1.0000

Heuristics 8

  • ClamAV: Heuristics.PDF.ObfuscatedNameObject critical CLAMAV_DETECTION
    ClamAV detected this file as malware: Heuristics.PDF.ObfuscatedNameObject
  • eval() call high PDF_EVAL
    eval() found — commonly used for obfuscated exploit execution
  • unescape() call high PDF_UNESCAPE
    unescape() found — often used to decode shellcode in PDF JS exploits (matched inside decoded stream)
  • JavaScript action low PDF_JAVASCRIPT
    PDF contains a /JavaScript action. Generic JavaScript is common in benign forms; specific dangerous APIs are scored by separate rules.
  • Embedded JS stream low PDF_JS
    PDF references a /JS stream. Generic JavaScript is common in benign forms; specific dangerous APIs are scored by separate rules.
  • Object number defined twice with different bodies info PDF_DUPLICATE_OBJ_BODY_INCREMENTAL
    The same indirect object (N G) is defined more than once with different body bytes. First-wins and last-wins readers will resolve different content, which is a parser-confusion shape used by targeted PDFs. Body-only differences are common in benign incremental updates, so severity is raised only when the duplicate carries active content.
  • PDF differential parser failed info PDF_DIFFERENTIAL_PARSE_FAILED
    The cross-check parser (pdfminer.six) failed on this file: PDF differential parser failed: PSSyntaxError. Static heuristics still ran and any of their findings above are valid; only the differential cross-check signal is missing.
  • Suspicious extracted artifact info EXTRACTED_FILE_STATIC_TRIAGE
    One or more files extracted from inside this sample matched static suspicious-content checks such as script obfuscation, encoded payload blobs, packed data, or execution/download terms.

Extracted artifacts 2

Files carved from inside the sample during analysis.

FilenameKindSourceSize
javascript_obj0116_000.js
075f873054e8a68115515157258e2e24be9f4bf99b75944d2de62b2cf1772580
pdf-javascript-stream PDF /JS object 116 at offset 0x4BB 45489 bytes
Detection
ClamAV: No threats found
Obfuscation or payload: likely
Carved artifact contains 256 eval/decoder/string-building token(s).
javascript_obj0123_002.js
628f8945cb8b1acc1aaea7e4646681713eb227911961a4cabade216c7476721a
pdf-javascript-stream PDF /JS object 123 at offset 0x386 16122 bytes
Detection
ClamAV: No threats found
Obfuscation or payload: likely
Carved artifact contains 1 eval/decoder/string-building token(s).